Tuesday, December 10, 2019
Advanced Critical Learning
Question: Discuss the advanced critical learning? Answer: From the case, it is found that Deno, Tisdale, Adams, Fairley and Dickerson are the four workers at the Waffle House Restaurant in Grand Bay, Alabama. An expected customer of this restaurant was Seward and she used to buy lottery tickets from Florida. He used to distribute the lottery tickets to the friends and family. A drawing for Florida lottery was programmed on 6th March 1999 and he arrived Florida before one week of the drawing. On the eve of the drawing, Seward gave three employees of Waffle House Restaurant the lottery ticket and unfortunately, none of them won. After the day of drawing, Seward gave Dickerson and other staff a ticket and dogged that that the figures of her voucher harmonized with the winning number. The ticket won a price of approximately $5 million. Therefore, the other employees who did not win the lottery price litigated Dickerson stating that they and Dickerson had oral contract with four of them and indicated that one of them must win and the conqueror must share the price with the other voucher participants. Therefore, it can be said that all of them were engaged in gambling. An Alabama decree states that all the contact details founded in whole or in a part on betting contemplation are invalid. The immediate reaction of the co-employees says that all of them were engaged in gambling and this avoids the Alabama statute. Therefore, it can be said that Dickerson must neither take part in gambling nor not encourage any of the co-employees, as this violates the statute of Alabama.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.